Kiyansh Group fixes Core Web Vitals and slow load times by finding what is actually slow — render-blocking JavaScript, oversized images, slow server response, and layout shift — and re-engineering those specific bottlenecks in code, not by installing a caching plugin and hoping. A senior US engineer audits your site against Google's real-world field data (LCP, INP, CLS), fixes the code and asset pipeline, and re-measures to confirm the metrics moved. We start with a free triage, work to a fixed scope, and you own all the code and accounts from day one.
Get a free speed & SEO triage →Core Web Vitals are three real-user metrics: Largest Contentful Paint (how fast the main content appears), Interaction to Next Paint (how fast the page responds to taps and clicks), and Cumulative Layout Shift (how much the layout jumps while it loads). Most failures trace back to a short list of causes: render-blocking CSS and JavaScript, images served far larger than they display, slow time-to-first-byte from an overloaded or under-configured server, third-party scripts (chat widgets, analytics, ad tags) that block the main thread, and elements loading without reserved space so content shifts. A plugin can mask one or two of these; actually fixing the failing metric means changing the code and asset pipeline that produce it.
We start from field data, not a one-off lab score — the numbers Google uses come from real Chrome users in the Chrome UX Report and Search Console, so that is what we target. A senior US engineer profiles the site, isolates the specific bottleneck behind each failing metric, and fixes it at the source: deferring and splitting JavaScript, compressing and correctly sizing images in modern formats with lazy-loading below the fold, cutting or self-hosting heavy third-party scripts, reserving space to kill layout shift, and tightening server response and caching headers. Then we re-measure in the same tools to confirm the metric moved. AI agents help us move through the grunt work fast, but a senior engineer directs every change so we never trade a speed win for a broken page.
A fast site that Google cannot crawl cleanly still will not rank, so we handle the technical SEO in the same pass: crawlability and indexing, canonical tags and redirects, sitemap and robots hygiene, structured data, and making sure the render path Googlebot sees matches what users get. Core Web Vitals are a ranking signal, but they sit on top of these fundamentals — if both are broken, fixing them together is faster and cheaper than two separate engagements. We tell you plainly which fixes will move rankings and which are just hygiene, so you are not paying for work that does not change outcomes.
Usually, yes. Most Core Web Vitals failures are code and asset problems on the existing site — script loading, image sizes, server config — and those get fixed in place. The honest exception is when the platform itself is the bottleneck: a page-builder theme that ships megabytes of unused CSS and JavaScript on every page can cap how fast the site will ever go. If that is your situation we will show you the ceiling before you spend, so you can choose between a targeted fix and a rebuild.
Both, in the same engagement. The audit that finds your speed bottlenecks also surfaces crawl, indexing, canonical, and structured-data issues, and it is more efficient to fix them together than to run two projects. If you only want the speed work, that is fine too — we will scope it that way.
We target field data — real-user metrics from the Chrome UX Report and Google Search Console — because that is what affects ranking, and we use lab tools like Lighthouse, PageSpeed Insights, and WebPageTest to reproduce and debug. The goal is to move your failing metrics into Google's good range on real-user data; a green lab score sitting on red field data is not the finish line. Field data updates over a rolling window, so the score in Search Console catches up over a few weeks after the fixes ship.
Yes, with honest limits. On WordPress we have full access to the theme, plugins, images, and server, so there is a lot we can fix. On closed platforms like Wix and Squarespace you are limited to what the platform exposes — we will get what we can on images, scripts, and layout shift, and tell you plainly where the platform caps performance and whether moving off it is worth it. We will not promise a green score a locked-down platform won't allow.
Tell us what you need — a build, a rescue, or a contractor — and we'll come back with a clear next step.
Get a free speed & SEO triage →