Published July 14, 2026 · Kiyansh Group
When a contract engineering seat stays empty for two months, the reflex is to blame the market — "there's no talent out there." Sometimes that's true. Far more often the req is stuck on something you control, and the candidates exist while your process quietly filters them out or loses them to a faster competitor. Here is where the sixty days actually go, and what to change this week.
Talk to us about staffing →Contractors don't sit and wait. A strong mid-to-senior engineer on the bench keeps three to five live conversations running at once, and the role that moves fastest usually wins. If your loop runs a phone screen one week, a panel the next, and 'let me get sign-off' after that, you lost the person before the offer stage. In contract hiring, speed is part of the offer.
Fix: compress the loop to two touches inside five business days — one technical conversation, one decision. Clear the budget and the start date before you open the req, not after you meet someone you like. Name one decision-maker who can say yes without convening a committee.
Read your own job description the way a candidate would. If it lists ten years, a full front-end and back-end stack, cloud, DevOps, and a niche domain — all marked required — the engineers who can genuinely do the core work self-select out, because they don't match all fifteen bullets. The people who apply anyway are often the ones who didn't read closely.
Fix: write down the three things this person will actually do in their first month. Make those the requirements; move the rest to 'nice to have.' A short, honest req attracts stronger candidates and speeds up screening on both sides.
Plenty of roles die inside the ATS. If your filter demands the exact framework and the exact number of years, you auto-reject an engineer who did the same work with an adjacent tool. Someone who shipped production services in one modern stack is productive in a sibling stack within a week — that's normal at this level, not a risk.
Fix: screen for the shape of the work — 'built and owned X under Y constraints' — not for string matches. Put an engineer, not a keyword rule, in front of the borderline resumes. You will usually recover a chunk of pipeline you were discarding without knowing it.
If you hire through vendors, some of the sixty days is handoff friction you never observe. The req sits in a queue, gets blasted to a wide list, and returns as loosely matched resumes days later. Every layer between you and the candidate adds delay and dilutes signal.
Fix: give your staffing partner the same tight req and the same fast loop you would run yourself, and ask for a few genuinely screened submissions instead of a stack. Insist on a same-week first submission and a named recruiter who actually read the description. Fewer, better, sooner beats volume every time.
That last standard is the one we hold ourselves to: at Kiyansh we send a short list of contractors a senior engineer has personally screened, not a pile to sort through.
Usually, yes. True scarcity is real for a handful of niche skill sets, but most 60-day roles are common stacks where candidates exist. Before you conclude the market is empty, check your time-to-first-interview and your reject rate at the resume stage — that's where the delay almost always hides.
For most mid-to-senior contract roles, first conversation within a week of a submission and a decision within five business days of that. Strong contractors are off the market in days, not weeks. If your internal approvals can't move that fast, fix the approvals before you reopen the search.
Not lower — sharper. Keep the three things the person must do well and stop treating a long wish list as mandatory. You're not dropping the bar; you're aiming it at what the job actually needs, which is what lets qualified people through.
If your role has been open longer than it should be, send it over — we'll tell you honestly whether it's the market or the req, and move fast on the ones we take.
Start a conversation →